What is the difference between the external and internal channel in the draft bill on whistleblowers?

In today's dynamically changing world, where transparency of the activities of companies and public institutions is becoming one of the key requirements, the role of whistleblowers is particularly important. Whistleblowers, i.e. people who report irregularities within the organization or institution in which they work, are on the front line of the fight for honesty and compliance with the law. Poland, following European solutions, has introduced a draft act on the protection of whistleblowers, which aims to provide protection to people who disclose violations. A key element of this act is the distinction between internal and external reporting channels. Although both channels have the same goal - to disclose and address violations of the law - they differ in many important respects, from the entities responsible for receiving reports, through the process of their verification, to the level of protection they offer to the whistleblower.

We will take a closer look at the differences between these two reporting routes. This analysis will not only help understand the mechanisms of both channels, but will also make it easier for whistleblowers to choose the right reporting route, which is crucial for their safety and effective pursuit of justice.